The approach for getting a PhD has always remained the same. With the passage of time, we see more and more PhDs on the domain and it is unarguable true that it is difficult to get a degree than it was ever before. Research is getting more and more review centric. To add to it, the kind of competition that is there in the academic world. Often these days, editors are seen accepting and rejecting the manuscript on the grounds of the contributions that have been offered in the paper. The greatest of academic careers are built on the basis of the published papers which serve as the ladder for climbing up on higher designations. The number of authors that compete for the same publishing space are higher than ever before and consequently finding space in a top tier journal is a challenge that not many are able to accomplish. It is important to be very clear about two things in the nascent stage of you academic career. Rather, I would say, do not start your academic career till the time you are not sure of these two things. They are:
- Have a clear vision about the contribution your PhD is going to make. The more focussed and narrower your vision be, the better it is.
- Develop the approach to learn to think like a reviewer or editor. You can do that by staying abreast with notes that the editors of the top tier journals keep updating. Do not leave any opportunity to meet the editor of journals in conferences and seminars. In fact, it should be on your list of priority when you go to attend any academic event. To add to it, grab opportunities to review others work. It is the best way to sharpen your own skills.
